Collaborate
Field Notes and Control Automation improve when people challenge them. If you have corrections, counterexamples, or a small build idea, here are the clean channels.
What’s useful
- Corrections (facts, definitions, links, or missing controls).
- Counterexamples (where the pattern breaks in real estates).
- Reusable patterns (templates, checklists, test scripts, evidence models).
- Joint builds (small, auditable artifacts that others can reuse).
Please avoid confidential or client-identifying material.
Choose a channel
Best for private context or when you don’t want public attribution. grcguy@rtapulse.com
Best for open-ended debate, alternative approaches, and “what if” threads. Open Discussions
Best for concrete fixes, requests, and trackable work items. Open Issues
Best for a quick connection or lightweight coordination (avoid sensitive details). View profile (opens on LinkedIn).
Point me to the page
If you’re sharing feedback, please include the link to the rtapulse page you mean. It helps me see the same context you’re seeing and act quickly — and it keeps the conversation clear for anyone who joins later.
Please keep it high-level — don’t include confidential or client details.